Posts filed under 'Good Places'

Hidden places in Los Angeles

A trip to Los Angeles is always fun. New York and LA couldn’t be more different. I got a bird’s eye view from our office tower of some of the public spaces downtown.

I thought this plaza was the most indicative of the type of places…beautiful perhaps from the sky - not friendly at all on the ground.

However, Little Tokyo was really fun. Small-scale, filled with people making use of the little ledges. Sit, stand or lean, they offer a bit of respite.

Add comment March 2nd, 2007

The Hidden Blessing of People’s Park

“What do you think of People’s Park?”. Most Berkeley residents will feel mildly tolerant of it, but would never advise anyone to visit. The grove of redwoods at the east end and the community gardens at the west shelter dozens of homeless residents and sometimes open drug activity. To most Berkeleyans, it is an area to be avoided. Some official maps still don’t acknowledge its existence. To others, it represents the triumph of the struggle of the “people” versus the Establishment. It is a place where someone can do most anything they want to do. It is a place of beautiful foliage, and for many it is home.

This sovereign piece of U.C. Berkeley property was slated to become a superblock of undergraduate residential dorms, administration buildings, and a parking lot in the 1960’s. But the protest of students, activists, and flower children kept the land tenuously free of such development for 38 years. People’s Park stands today as a stark example of a mild anarchy, free of much police interference, and governed only by loose values of tolerance and personal liberty. This contrasts other public spaces such as shopping malls or even city parks where security guards and police have greater powers to regulate a person’s right of occupation.

Now to be perfectly honest: I don’t like People’s Park. Nor do I think it should even exist. I live one block from the park and I pass it on my way to many places. It feels unsafe. Too much illicit activity is tolerated there. It’s not an appealing place to visit. The park is kept in a scruffy, disorderly, and in a “Berkeley-like” appearance. The park was illegally seized from the University and there is a perfectly good park two blocks south.

The very existence of People’s Park in such near proximity has been a continual, unwelcome reminder to me of our society’s chronic homeless and drug problems. Since I’ve lived here, I have had to deal with the tension of my more than sufficient life juxtaposed with the more meager lives of those down the street. My response has been to ignore this scene.

When at last I took up an opportunity to distribute bagged lunches to homeless residents in People’s Park, my perspective of this place changed completely. I met genuinely nice people, most of a sound mind. I met people who worked hard: collecting cans, tending community gardens. I met people who cared and looked out for others. But unfortunately most of all, I met vulnerable people: people exposed to the elements; exposed to predators and drug pushers; exposed to disease and rot. In most respects, I met people a lot like you and me.

People’s Park is not some abomination, a refuge of strange people, or catastrophic failure of government. People’s Park is a TRANSPARENT place. There are a lot of normal people living in a home without walls. We can see everything that goes on and we don’t like it. First, we don’t like the fact that there are people living such miserable lives in this age of wealth and technology. But second, we don’t like to see the common struggles of society, such as substance abuse, disease, and violence in such plain sight. These things happen to people in all walks of life - in nice neighborhoods as well as bad - and perhaps in more subtle ways. But is it any better to have abuse or violence happen behind the facade of a cozy bungalow? Do we prefer to pretend that the cute porches of a traditional neighborhood represent the harmonious and happy existence of our society?

These are difficult questions to face, and if you have been able to face them without jadedness, I applaud you. Personally, I am content to believe that attractive urban form has its place and represents our aspiration as humans to live in a rich, harmonious existence (i.e. a desire for heaven). Why should we aspire to live or see people live in a dwelling other than one that reflects each person’s own sense of dignity?

However, the redemptive quality of People’s Park is that we see our society for what it is: not without its struggles and flaws. It is better to see the truth, however uneasy to face, than to hide it. If we see our blights in plain sight, and face up to it, we can perhaps tackle a real problem. And if we look a little harder, we can see a whole lot of good things happening in a place where we least expect.

2 comments February 23rd, 2007

Adaptable Design

Designing places that will work for ALL people…

“Universal design is a relatively new concept that seeks to go beyond those codes to make the built environment usable by all people without the need for adaptation. This might include kitchen islands with adjustable-height countertops, front-loading washers and dryers, roll-in showers, and no-step entrances, eliminating the need for ramps.

But the important point, according to universal design advocates, is that it looks and feels like a normal apartment building. Rather than relying on designs that can segregate people according to their disability (impaired vision versus low mobility, for example), the intent of universal design is to create products and environments usable by as many people as possible, including people with no disabilities at all.”

LINK: From the New York Times (read it before it’s archived!)

Add comment January 12th, 2007

Evaluating Places 101: What makes a place fail?

Part of the vision behind “This Place Is…” is to encourage ordinary people (not just urbanists and planners) to think critically about the places around them. I haven’t seen a better resource for getting started than the excellent primers from the Project for Public Spaces:

Why Many Public Spaces Fail

William H. Whyte once said, “It is difficult to design a space that will not attract people - what is remarkable is how often this has been accomplished.” Today, many public spaces seem to be intentionally designed to be looked at but not touched. They are neat, clean, and empty - as if to say, “no people, no problem!” But to us, when a public space is empty, vandalized, or used chiefly by undesirables, this is generally an indication that something is very wrong with its design, or its management, or both.

The following pairs of photographs illustrate some of the most common problems of public spaces.

Lack of places to sit - Many public spaces don’t even provide a place to sit. So, in their protracted quest just to be comfortable, people are often forced to adapt to the situation in their own way. Sometimes they simply give up (below), or have to sit on briefcases (second image below).

A lack of good places to sit is an equally important issue. For example, a choice of seats in sun or shade can make all the difference in a place’s success, depending on its climate and location. Allowing people to sit near a playground or within view of other activities is also crucial.

Lack of gathering points - This includes features people want or need, such as playgrounds, or places where varying elements–bus stop, vending cart, outdoor seating–combine to create a gathering point. Food is often a critical component of a successful gathering point.

Paris’ Parc de la Villette (top) has seats that force people to sit in unsociable ways, and signs that ask them not to climb on the sculpture. Though located along a stretch of the Pacific Coast Highway, this park at Laguna Beach (near top) has loads of activities, food, and places to sit. It is a busy, healthy gathering place.

Poor entrances and visually inaccessible spaces - If a space is to be used, people need to see it and they need to be able to get to it.

A dark or narrow entrance such as those that used to be at New York City’s Bryant Park (top) keeps people out instead of inviting them in. The same entrance (near top), redesigned to be more inviting and open, has kiosks that sell coffee and sandwiches, and the interior of the park is visible from the street.

Dysfunctional features - Oftentimes features are designed simply to punctuate the space, serving a use more visual than functional, instead of encouraging activity to occur around them - as at this waterfront park in Barcelona, below.

Good features, such as the friendly gorilla at the Berlin Zoo (above), encourage activity to occur around them.

Paths that don’t go where people want to go

Paths that lead to nowhere are useless, as demonstrated at this Phoenix, Arizona park (top). The Luxembourg Gardens in Paris, however (near top), show the art of making a path that pulls people along it, or allows them to stop and relax.

Domination of a space by vehicles - There may be a lack of crosswalks, or streets that are too wide, or lacking sidewalks.

A main street is not a highway. One should not fear crossing the street so much that the activity needs to occur in groups, as on George Street in Sydney, Australia (top). Crossing the street should be an easy, comfortable activity. Even if you have to wait (near top, Paris, France)

Blank walls or dead zones around the edges of a place - The area around a space is as important to its success as the design and management of the space itself.

The blank wall (near top) contributes nothing to the activity of the street. In fact, it doesn’t even seem real.

Inconveniently located transit stops - Bus or train stops located in places where no one wants to use them are a good recipe for failure.

A transit stop located in a busy, active place can not only make that place better, but also increase transit use.

From the Project for Public Spaces’ article, Why Many Public Spaces Fail

So do you know of any places that make these mistakes (or that do these things well)? We’d love to see (and post!) your snapshots on This Place Is!

Ready for more? Now that you’ve thought about what makes a place fail…

The Project for Public Spaces is at the forefront of people-centered place design. The PPS is a non-profit organization dedicated to promoting a people-centric rather than project-centric approach to creating places. Their website is rich in resources for those interested in this subject. We’ll be posting other highlights soon.

Add comment September 12th, 2006

Rethinking the Library Experience

What images and feelings does the word “library” bring to mind? Quiet? Quaint? Confusing? Dusty? Old? Academic? Even if you love libraries, how easy is it really for an average person to find their way around?

Carnegie Library: Before and After

Carnegie Library of Pittsburgh recognized that it would take more than an aesthetic facelift to convey the welcoming experience exuded by user-friendly environs like Barnes and Noble and Amazon.com. Enlisting the help of Maya Design, they dared to walk in their users’ shoes and discovered insights that lead to a user-centered overhaul of the library’s organization:

People are generally in a hurry. “To remain relevant, libraries must get patrons in the door and in front of the materials they want quickly and easily.”

Library lingo makes users feel like strangers in a strange land, a land that cannot be navigated without an insider’s help. Libraries label things in jargon (”reference desk”) and use complicated numeric systems to organize resources (a la Dewey Decimals).

People look for the “Cookbooks” section, not the 600’s. This may not sound shocking, but when’s the last time you saw a library marked with strategically placed signs like those obvious ones used by their retail counterparts: “Cookbooks” and “Health & Fitness?”

The library experience should be consistent regardless of how it’s accessed, from the web to in person and from one section to another. “If users can interact with one small part of the library experience and predict how other parts work, it makes them feel powerful.”

For more food for thought on how library design affects user experience and to learn how Carnegie and other libraries have addressed these issues, check out…

Link: Library Journal: Transforming the Library Experience
Link: Maya Design’s Carnegie Library Case Study

2 comments September 5th, 2006

Sidewalk Coverings

Spend a hot afternoon in Old Sacramento and you quickly understand why early settlers went through the trouble to build fancy porches over the sidewalk: Protection from the brutal sun.

old sacramento

As hot as it is in Sac, it really doesn’t seem so bad when you’re under some shade.

But the unintended benefit of these roofs is that they draw the indoor activity out into the public realm of the sidewalk: Colorful signs and merchandise displays seem to belong among the pedestrians. Walking along the street is just like window shopping, only in 3 dimensions. These porticos also add additional real estate to the second story of the building.

old sacramento storefront up close

This sort of feature would be perfect for east coast and midwest cities where there are different sorts of elements to battle in different seasons. It might be an effective strategy to enliven a downtown commercial district.

Add comment August 14th, 2006

Making Sacrifices to Create Pleasant Experiences

San Diego - C & 6th St.

I like how San Diego incorporated light rail into its downtown. They took a section of C St. and dedicated it solely as a transit/pedestrian street. As seen here, this pedestrian in the center is free to read a book quietly while waiting for her train. Another can safely venture out into the street. The boundry between sidewalk to streetway feels safely marked yet comfortable to cross.

I can only speculate about what it took to convince the driving public that sacrificing automobile capacity for a handsomely designed transit street would be more beneficial to the city in the long run.

Add comment August 7th, 2006


Posts by Category

Posts by Month

Calendar

May 2008
M T W T F S S
« Mar    
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031