Posts filed under 'Methodology'

Exploring the Human Layer of Cities

“The increasing deployment of sensors and hand-held electronics in recent years is allowing a new approach to the study of the built environment. The way we describe and understand cities is being radically transformed - alongside the tools we use to design them and impact on their physical structure.

Studying these changes from a critical point of view and anticipating them is the goal of the SENSEable City Laboratory, a new research initiative at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.”

“[This] project (Real-Time Rome) aggregated data from cell phones, buses and taxis in Rome to better understand urban dynamics in real time. By revealing the pulse of the city, the project aims to show how technology can help individuals make more informed decisions about their environment.”

LINK: http://senseable.mit.edu/
RELATED POSTS: Personal Paths Through Cities

1 comment September 25th, 2006

The Nashville Street Life Project

a behavioral map showing usages of the park

Hooray for cities that actually practice the people-centered place design process! The Nashville Civic Design Center recognizes that creating public gathering places that attract groups of people is essential to keeping a downtown alive.

Through surveys (to assess people’s perception of places), observation (including behavioral mapping of which parts of the park are used throughout the day and how), and pedestrian counts, they studied Church Street Park’s…

…sociability (are people seen in groups there? is it a good place to meet)

…access and linkages (does the park draw people in? does it have clear entrances?)

…activities (are there good gathering points? are there enough places to sit?)

…and image (how do people perceive this park?).

Check out their preliminary findings (6.6mb PDF, best to right click and download).
LINK: http://www.civicdesigncenter.org/projects-streetlife.html

Add comment September 24th, 2006

How to Engage the Community in Urban Projects?

“Community Planning Centers are customized websites designed by Project for Public Spaces whose purpose is to involve local people more directly and effectively in a public space project.”

These websites make information about planning projects publicly available and invite community participation and feedback. Their example sites…

Omaha by Design
Littleton Places

The principle is excellent, but I’d like to see sites like these take the interactive dimension even further, making it easier for people to share their experiences with places (and not just their feedback, which these sites seem to primarily solicit, because not everyone knows they even have opinions!)

Food for thought: How can a community website engage ordinary, busy, everyday residents? What engages YOU?

  • Google’s gotten people to tag their images by turning it into an addicting and relatively mindless game (Google Image Labeler).
  • The City of Pittsburgh’s Map Hub has gotten resident cyclists posting their bike accidents and bike resources on a collaborative map.
  • An interesting enough flickr photo pool can get thousands of people to expose their habits under the guise of self-expression (while unwittingly providing valuable insights for designers!)

How can urban planners take advantage of collaborative web technologies to understand people’s experiences and needs and in turn create places that succeed?

LINK: About Community Planning Centers

Add comment September 18th, 2006

Evaluating Places 101: What makes a place fail?

Part of the vision behind “This Place Is…” is to encourage ordinary people (not just urbanists and planners) to think critically about the places around them. I haven’t seen a better resource for getting started than the excellent primers from the Project for Public Spaces:

Why Many Public Spaces Fail

William H. Whyte once said, “It is difficult to design a space that will not attract people - what is remarkable is how often this has been accomplished.” Today, many public spaces seem to be intentionally designed to be looked at but not touched. They are neat, clean, and empty - as if to say, “no people, no problem!” But to us, when a public space is empty, vandalized, or used chiefly by undesirables, this is generally an indication that something is very wrong with its design, or its management, or both.

The following pairs of photographs illustrate some of the most common problems of public spaces.

Lack of places to sit - Many public spaces don’t even provide a place to sit. So, in their protracted quest just to be comfortable, people are often forced to adapt to the situation in their own way. Sometimes they simply give up (below), or have to sit on briefcases (second image below).

A lack of good places to sit is an equally important issue. For example, a choice of seats in sun or shade can make all the difference in a place’s success, depending on its climate and location. Allowing people to sit near a playground or within view of other activities is also crucial.

Lack of gathering points - This includes features people want or need, such as playgrounds, or places where varying elements–bus stop, vending cart, outdoor seating–combine to create a gathering point. Food is often a critical component of a successful gathering point.

Paris’ Parc de la Villette (top) has seats that force people to sit in unsociable ways, and signs that ask them not to climb on the sculpture. Though located along a stretch of the Pacific Coast Highway, this park at Laguna Beach (near top) has loads of activities, food, and places to sit. It is a busy, healthy gathering place.

Poor entrances and visually inaccessible spaces - If a space is to be used, people need to see it and they need to be able to get to it.

A dark or narrow entrance such as those that used to be at New York City’s Bryant Park (top) keeps people out instead of inviting them in. The same entrance (near top), redesigned to be more inviting and open, has kiosks that sell coffee and sandwiches, and the interior of the park is visible from the street.

Dysfunctional features - Oftentimes features are designed simply to punctuate the space, serving a use more visual than functional, instead of encouraging activity to occur around them - as at this waterfront park in Barcelona, below.

Good features, such as the friendly gorilla at the Berlin Zoo (above), encourage activity to occur around them.

Paths that don’t go where people want to go

Paths that lead to nowhere are useless, as demonstrated at this Phoenix, Arizona park (top). The Luxembourg Gardens in Paris, however (near top), show the art of making a path that pulls people along it, or allows them to stop and relax.

Domination of a space by vehicles - There may be a lack of crosswalks, or streets that are too wide, or lacking sidewalks.

A main street is not a highway. One should not fear crossing the street so much that the activity needs to occur in groups, as on George Street in Sydney, Australia (top). Crossing the street should be an easy, comfortable activity. Even if you have to wait (near top, Paris, France)

Blank walls or dead zones around the edges of a place - The area around a space is as important to its success as the design and management of the space itself.

The blank wall (near top) contributes nothing to the activity of the street. In fact, it doesn’t even seem real.

Inconveniently located transit stops - Bus or train stops located in places where no one wants to use them are a good recipe for failure.

A transit stop located in a busy, active place can not only make that place better, but also increase transit use.

From the Project for Public Spaces’ article, Why Many Public Spaces Fail

So do you know of any places that make these mistakes (or that do these things well)? We’d love to see (and post!) your snapshots on This Place Is!

Ready for more? Now that you’ve thought about what makes a place fail…

The Project for Public Spaces is at the forefront of people-centered place design. The PPS is a non-profit organization dedicated to promoting a people-centric rather than project-centric approach to creating places. Their website is rich in resources for those interested in this subject. We’ll be posting other highlights soon.

Add comment September 12th, 2006

Ever Feel Lost on Public Transportation?

Is it a coincidence that millions more Americans travel by car and plane than bus or train? “The very word ‘lost’ in our language means much more than simple geographic uncertainty,” wrote Kevin Lynch, who cleared a path for the modern art and science of wayfinding in his landmark work, The Image of the City. “[I]t carries overtones of utter disaster.” Getting lost on public transportation may not be disastrous for passengers, but when tourists are turned off by the experience, it’s a disaster for cities; when new users aren’t turned into repeat customers, it’s a disaster for transit agencies and for society; and even regular riders sometimes require reinforcement.

We all know that being lost is a bad experience. Wayfinding design, for those unfamiliar with it, is about creating creating comforting experiences through designing understandable spaces that make people feel in control of their surroundings and choices.

For many, unfortunately, public transportation represents the opposite of a comforting experience.

Thus, I’m excited about San Francisco’s Wayfinding Project and the steps they’re taking towards enhancing the wayfinding experience of transportation users. Their recommendations are simple but practical, and include….

Recommendations for Busses and Streetcars:

Include Transfer Information on Signs
Add Signs Featuring Destination Information
Improve Shelters and Provide Basic Information at All Stops
Simplify Destination Descriptions

Recommendations for Subways and Commuter Rails:

Color-Code BART Lines
Remove Outdated, Damaged and Non-Standard Maps and Signs
Clearly Differentiate BART and Muni Entrances
Streamline and Enhance Station- and Platform-Identification Signs
Add and Upgrade Directional Signage
List and Give Directions to Destinations Near BART
Add Signs Along Pedestrian Pathways to BART
Clearly Designate Pathways to Connecting Transit

Food for thought… What have your public transportation experiences been like? Do you have any suggestions for ways that your local transportation system’s wayfinding experience could be improved?

LINK: The San Francisco Wayfinding Project [via Adventures in Urban Living]
RELATED: Rethinking the Library Experience

4 comments September 9th, 2006

Rethinking the Library Experience

What images and feelings does the word “library” bring to mind? Quiet? Quaint? Confusing? Dusty? Old? Academic? Even if you love libraries, how easy is it really for an average person to find their way around?

Carnegie Library: Before and After

Carnegie Library of Pittsburgh recognized that it would take more than an aesthetic facelift to convey the welcoming experience exuded by user-friendly environs like Barnes and Noble and Amazon.com. Enlisting the help of Maya Design, they dared to walk in their users’ shoes and discovered insights that lead to a user-centered overhaul of the library’s organization:

People are generally in a hurry. “To remain relevant, libraries must get patrons in the door and in front of the materials they want quickly and easily.”

Library lingo makes users feel like strangers in a strange land, a land that cannot be navigated without an insider’s help. Libraries label things in jargon (”reference desk”) and use complicated numeric systems to organize resources (a la Dewey Decimals).

People look for the “Cookbooks” section, not the 600’s. This may not sound shocking, but when’s the last time you saw a library marked with strategically placed signs like those obvious ones used by their retail counterparts: “Cookbooks” and “Health & Fitness?”

The library experience should be consistent regardless of how it’s accessed, from the web to in person and from one section to another. “If users can interact with one small part of the library experience and predict how other parts work, it makes them feel powerful.”

For more food for thought on how library design affects user experience and to learn how Carnegie and other libraries have addressed these issues, check out…

Link: Library Journal: Transforming the Library Experience
Link: Maya Design’s Carnegie Library Case Study

2 comments September 5th, 2006

Video Shorts Capturing Urban Places

Turn Here celebrates the uniqueness of urban places, as documented through locals by amateur video contributors.

It’s great to see people discovering that their neighborhood has a unique identity that they can be proud of, even if that identity is not nationally recognized.

Link: TURN HERE: Short Films, Cool Places
Link: Video on Davis, CA

Add comment August 8th, 2006

What’s Wrong With This Place? Ask the Community!

A noble effort by the city of Love Lewisham to involve the community in identifying problems in the urban environment.

At this site, residents can easily post photos of issues along with descriptions and location info to be reviewed and addressed by the borough.

The reports are primarily of abuse problems (graffitti, junk left on streets), not design problems, but it’s an interesting way of getting the community involved nonetheless!

Link: http://www.lovelewisham.org/public/images.aspx

1 comment August 8th, 2006

Personal Paths Through Cities

Attach GPS locators to people and the resulting maps reveal a lot:

Cabspotting traces San Francisco’s taxi cabs as they travel throughout the Bay Area. The patterns traced by each cab create a living and always-changing map of city life. This map hints at economic, social, and cultural trends that are otherwise invisible.

Amsterdam RealTime: Every inhabitant of Amsterdam has an invisble map of the city in his head. The way he moves about the city and the choices made in this process are determined by this mental map. Amsterdam RealTime attampts to visualize these mental maps through examining the mobile behaviour of the city’s users.

Link: Amsterdam Real-Time
Link: San Francisco Cabspotting

Add comment August 6th, 2006

Documenting the Urban Experience


I’m intrigued by how flickr photo pools are being used to tap into people’s experiences.

This one is an endeavor by a user experience guy, Joshua Kaufman, to get people thinking about “information, design, interaction and usability” within the urban environment.

It’s less about the design OF the spaces and more about design WITHIN the spaces (environmental graphics, signs, etc), but well worth looking at!

Link: “Urban Experience” Flickr Photo Pool

1 comment August 3rd, 2006


Posts by Category

Posts by Month

Calendar

July 2008
M T W T F S S
« Mar    
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031